Showing posts with label British Council. Show all posts
Showing posts with label British Council. Show all posts
Monday, 16 January 2017
Saturday, 14 January 2017
CELTA Written Assignment: Lessons from the classroom
Teaching Strengths
1.
Setting up activities
Before the CELTA course, I used to struggle a lot with
setting up activities. I had to repeat some instructions many times and quite
often I saw that my students looked puzzled. During the input session with
Barbara, I learnt how to successfully set up an activity. During TP sessions, I
noticed how fellow trainees Katie and Cristina used ICQs and demoed the
activities and I tried to do it during my lessons. At the beginning I always
forgot about something but eventually I’ve managed to do it all. My students
have been able to follow my instructions and by using ICQs I was sure that they
really knew what to do. During Tutorial 2, I was told that setting up
activities is one of my main strengths.
2.
Lesson planning
I never prepared detailed lesson plans, I honestly
considered them a waste of time. However, I changed my mind while observing
fellow trainees teaching. I realised that a good plan means a very well
organised lesson. The more detailed the plan the smaller the possibility of
being asked a question we are not prepared for. After observing one of the DVD
lessons (If I found a little money…), we were given a lesson plan and I
realised that it’s a very good idea to include CCQs, ICQs and form checking
questions. I noticed during TP sessions that when Katie included her ICQs in
the lesson plan she always used them. So I decided to do the same. My tutor
commented on how I used my CCQs included in the lesson plan during the TP
feedback. Having a well thought plan has helped me overcome my initial stress
and move smoothly from one activity to another.
3.
Language analysis
Even though I studied linguistics I never used the knowledge
to analyse the language I teach. After observing fellow trainees, Cristina and
Ewa, I realised it is important to adjust the language in the classroom to the learner group and the context (CELTA 5
– 2a). I started paying more attention
to the language I use and analyse more carefully the language in terms of form
and meaning. Also, my tutor has highlighted during Tutorial 2 that I’ve worked
well on providing clear context and a communicative context for language which
led to “meaningful communicative practice of TL”. Thanks to analysing the
language I am about to teach I feel more confident during TP sessions and know
what kind of problems I can encounter during the lesson which I find very
useful.
Development needs
1.
Using too much TTT
Before CELTA course I didn’t know what TTT was and that I
definitely overused it. I’ve been working on reducing TTT, especially echoing,
but so far I haven’t stopped doing it. I should apply some of the techniques
that I observed while watching experienced teachers. During the demo class for
the trainees, Declan and Peter used praising students instead of repeating the
answer for them. Also, I should elicit more and ask for more justifications
from students as I could see in the DVD with Nick (lesson about listening and
phonology). Finally, I could use more gestures, for example to show pair work
which I saw during TP sessions, for example Cristina uses it very naturally.
2.
Monitoring and error correction
I am a very passive teacher while monitoring. During TP
feedback my tutor has suggested that I should interact more at times and I
should be more helpful. During TP sessions, I noticed that Nigel and Katie
observe students closely and they use of a lot of on-the-spot correction.
Something I should definitely include while monitoring. Also, while observing
experienced teachers, I noticed how Declan approached students and how Peter
used white colour to write students’ mistakes on the board without interrupting
the activity. I would like to copy these techniques during my future lessons.
3.
Teaching pronunciation
I am extremely self-conscious about my pronunciation and it
visibly affects the way I teach it. In almost every tutor observation notes I
can read that I need to focus more on drilling, don’t skip it and use a varied
range of drills. During DVD observations, I could see how to use fingers to
teach students contractions and connected speech. Later on I had an opportunity
to see Ewa, one of the trainees, use this technique during drilling and it
worked very well. I would also like to practice drilling in a more friendly
atmosphere. During Tutorial 2 it’s been suggested that I sometimes sound
like barking dog. I would definitely
like to work on that.
Action plan
|
Areas to work on:
|
Action plan:
|
|
1. Reducing TTT
|
a.
I’ll watch Jo Gakonga’s video on Teacher echo and IRF to analyse the
reasons why I echo my students’ answers in order to reduce it.
b.
I’ll read an article on Teacher talking time on https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/teacher-talking-time.
c.
Once a month, I’ll record myself in order to
check how much TTT I use.
|
|
2. Improving monitoring and error correction
|
a.
I will read Chapter 8 on Mistakes and feedback in The practice of English language teaching
by Jeremy Harmer.
b.
I’ll plan more time to the PACS stage and I’ll
include possible that students might make in the lesson plan so as to have
more errors to analyse.
c.
I’ll observe two different colleagues to see how
they monitor their students and try to introduce their techniques during my lessons.
|
|
3.
Teaching
pronunciation
|
a.
I’ll do an online Teaching pronunciation course
available on the Cambridge English Teacher
website to improve my teaching skills in this idea.
b.
I will read Chapter 15 on Teaching pronunciation in The practice of English language teaching
by Jeremy Harmer.
c.
I will test drilling first on my colleagues to
check if they respond well to my instructions and the techniques I use.
|
Thursday, 22 December 2016
CELTA Written Assignment: Language Related Tasks Assignment
Analysis of a functional language: Would you mind if I opened the
window?
[Level: Upper-Intermediate]
|
|||||
A.
MEANING
ANALYSIS
|
Would
you mind . . . ? is often used to ask people to do things or to
ask for permission.”
Reference: Swan p.331; Section 342
It’s more formal and polite than
using “Can I open the window?” and shows social distance between the
speakers.
Reference: https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/analysing-language
|
||||
B.
MEANING
ILLUSTRATION
|
I’d show a picture of
two flatmates talking to each other. I’d display the dialogue in speech
bubbles with the target language contextualised.
Mark: It’s really hot in this room. Would you mind if I opened the window?
Tom: Not at all!
|
||||
C. MEANING CHECK
|
·
Does
Mark want to open the window? (yes)
·
Is
Mark asking for Tom’s permission? (yes)
·
Is the
conversation rather formal or informal? (formal)
·
Is it
a polite or casual way of asking for a permission? (polite)
·
Are
Mark and Tom very close friends? (no)
Checking response:
·
Does Tom allow Mark to open the window? (yes)
|
||||
D.
FORM
ANALYSIS
|
|
||||
E.
PRONUNCIATION
ANALYSIS
|
The arrows show sentence
intonation:
↗ ↗
Would you MIND if I Opened the WINdow?
Words in bold show sentence
stress and capitals show the main stress.
|
||||
Analysis of a lexical item: I insist on it! (phrasal verb)[Level:
Upper-Intermediate]
|
|
A.
MEANING
ANALYSIS
|
Reference: Oxford Learner’s dictionaries
http://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/insist-on?q=insist+on
|
B.
MEANING
ILLUSTRATION
|
I’d show the picture and role play the following
dialogue with one of the students:
Paul:
It’s getting late. I should go home now.
Margaret:
No, no. Please stay and have dinner with us.
Paul:
Oh, I don’t know I didn’t plan on dinner.
Margaret:
It would make us really happy.
Paul:
Mhm, I’m not sure.
Margaret:
I insist on it!
Paul:
OK then. I’ll stay.
|
C. MEANING CHECK
|
·
Did Margaret really want Paul to stay and have
dinner with them? (yes)
·
Did Margaret ask Paul to stay and have dinner
with them or did she demand it? (demanded)
·
Was Margaret willing to accept a “no” to her
invitation? (no)
·
If somebody insists on something, do you have
a choice?
|
D.
FORM
ANALYSIS
|
insist on
something
OR
insist on
verb+ing
Insist is a regular verb. It can be followed by on or upon (more formal and less common).
It’s a type B phrasal verb. “These phrasal verbs
take a direct object (they are transitive) but you cannot separate the two
parts of the verb.”
Reference:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/flatmates/episode33/languagepoint.shtml
|
E.
PRONUNCIATION
ANALYSIS
|
I INsist on it!
Words in bold show sentence
stress and capitals show the main stress.
Note: It’s an exclamatory
sentence. The intonation at the beginning of the sentence is higher than in
an affirmative sentence and it falls. The stressed syllable is pronounced
more loudly and has stronger stress.
|
Analysis of a lexical item: I’m sick and tired of it! (idiom)[Level:
Upper-Intermediate]
|
|
A.
MEANING
ANALYSIS
|
to be sick and tired of sth (informal) to have experienced too
much of someone or something with the result that you are annoyed
Reference: Cambridge Dictionary
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/sick-and-tired-of-someone-something?q=sick+%28and+tired%29+of+someone%2Fsomething
|
B.
MEANING
ILLUSTRATION
|
I’d tell the students
about my (imaginary) friend Anna, who’s lived in a big city for a long time
and who hates it. I’d show this picture: |
C. MEANING CHECK
|
·
Is
Anna happy about living in a big city? (no)
·
Is she
annoyed? (yes)
·
Has
she had enough of living in the city? (yes)
·
Does
she want to continue living in the city? (no)
·
Is
Anna sick? (no)
·
Is she
tired? (no)
·
Is
this a formal phrase? (no)
|
D.
FORM
ANALYSIS
|
subj. + be + sick
and tired of + object
OR
subj. + be + sick
and tired of + verb+ing
Sick and
tired is a fixed expression and we cannot change the order of the
adjectives, e.g.
The only part of this idiom that changes it the
verb be.
|
E.
PRONUNCIATION
ANALYSIS
|
I’m SICK and TIRed of it!
Words in bold show sentence
stress and capitals show the main stress.
Note: It’s an exclamatory
sentence. The intonation at the beginning of the sentence is higher than in
an affirmative sentence and it falls. The stressed syllable is pronounced
more loudly and has stronger stress.
Note 2: “and” is pronounced very
weakly here. We hear just /ən/.
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





