Teaching Strengths
1.
Setting up activities
Before the CELTA course, I used to struggle a lot with
setting up activities. I had to repeat some instructions many times and quite
often I saw that my students looked puzzled. During the input session with
Barbara, I learnt how to successfully set up an activity. During TP sessions, I
noticed how fellow trainees Katie and Cristina used ICQs and demoed the
activities and I tried to do it during my lessons. At the beginning I always
forgot about something but eventually I’ve managed to do it all. My students
have been able to follow my instructions and by using ICQs I was sure that they
really knew what to do. During Tutorial 2, I was told that setting up
activities is one of my main strengths.
2.
Lesson planning
I never prepared detailed lesson plans, I honestly
considered them a waste of time. However, I changed my mind while observing
fellow trainees teaching. I realised that a good plan means a very well
organised lesson. The more detailed the plan the smaller the possibility of
being asked a question we are not prepared for. After observing one of the DVD
lessons (If I found a little money…), we were given a lesson plan and I
realised that it’s a very good idea to include CCQs, ICQs and form checking
questions. I noticed during TP sessions that when Katie included her ICQs in
the lesson plan she always used them. So I decided to do the same. My tutor
commented on how I used my CCQs included in the lesson plan during the TP
feedback. Having a well thought plan has helped me overcome my initial stress
and move smoothly from one activity to another.
3.
Language analysis
Even though I studied linguistics I never used the knowledge
to analyse the language I teach. After observing fellow trainees, Cristina and
Ewa, I realised it is important to adjust the language in the classroom to the learner group and the context (CELTA 5
– 2a). I started paying more attention
to the language I use and analyse more carefully the language in terms of form
and meaning. Also, my tutor has highlighted during Tutorial 2 that I’ve worked
well on providing clear context and a communicative context for language which
led to “meaningful communicative practice of TL”. Thanks to analysing the
language I am about to teach I feel more confident during TP sessions and know
what kind of problems I can encounter during the lesson which I find very
useful.
Development needs
1.
Using too much TTT
Before CELTA course I didn’t know what TTT was and that I
definitely overused it. I’ve been working on reducing TTT, especially echoing,
but so far I haven’t stopped doing it. I should apply some of the techniques
that I observed while watching experienced teachers. During the demo class for
the trainees, Declan and Peter used praising students instead of repeating the
answer for them. Also, I should elicit more and ask for more justifications
from students as I could see in the DVD with Nick (lesson about listening and
phonology). Finally, I could use more gestures, for example to show pair work
which I saw during TP sessions, for example Cristina uses it very naturally.
2.
Monitoring and error correction
I am a very passive teacher while monitoring. During TP
feedback my tutor has suggested that I should interact more at times and I
should be more helpful. During TP sessions, I noticed that Nigel and Katie
observe students closely and they use of a lot of on-the-spot correction.
Something I should definitely include while monitoring. Also, while observing
experienced teachers, I noticed how Declan approached students and how Peter
used white colour to write students’ mistakes on the board without interrupting
the activity. I would like to copy these techniques during my future lessons.
3.
Teaching pronunciation
I am extremely self-conscious about my pronunciation and it
visibly affects the way I teach it. In almost every tutor observation notes I
can read that I need to focus more on drilling, don’t skip it and use a varied
range of drills. During DVD observations, I could see how to use fingers to
teach students contractions and connected speech. Later on I had an opportunity
to see Ewa, one of the trainees, use this technique during drilling and it
worked very well. I would also like to practice drilling in a more friendly
atmosphere. During Tutorial 2 it’s been suggested that I sometimes sound
like barking dog. I would definitely
like to work on that.
Action plan
Areas to work on:
|
Action plan:
|
1. Reducing TTT
|
a.
I’ll watch Jo Gakonga’s video on Teacher echo and IRF to analyse the
reasons why I echo my students’ answers in order to reduce it.
b.
I’ll read an article on Teacher talking time on https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/teacher-talking-time.
c.
Once a month, I’ll record myself in order to
check how much TTT I use.
|
2. Improving monitoring and error correction
|
a.
I will read Chapter 8 on Mistakes and feedback in The practice of English language teaching
by Jeremy Harmer.
b.
I’ll plan more time to the PACS stage and I’ll
include possible that students might make in the lesson plan so as to have
more errors to analyse.
c.
I’ll observe two different colleagues to see how
they monitor their students and try to introduce their techniques during my lessons.
|
3.
Teaching
pronunciation
|
a.
I’ll do an online Teaching pronunciation course
available on the Cambridge English Teacher
website to improve my teaching skills in this idea.
b.
I will read Chapter 15 on Teaching pronunciation in The practice of English language teaching
by Jeremy Harmer.
c.
I will test drilling first on my colleagues to
check if they respond well to my instructions and the techniques I use.
|
Hello, Paulina. I`m Alexey, from Russia. I`m looking through your blog and find it very helpful in terms of ideas and techniques. Our Celta course was dismissed halfway across last week due to the restrictions in Moscow. So we`ll have to finish it with one of the next courses this summer or autumn. It`s ruining all our plan, but it is what it is for now. The virus is speading and it`s affecting all our lives.
ReplyDeleteThank you!
ReplyDelete